To help solidify this concept, here are two mobile-friendly drill setups that directly apply the two-phase progression, moving from the foundational Anchor to the intentional Control Step.
Phase 1 Drill: Mastering the Anchor (The Stop-Block)
This drill isolates lateral stability and forces skaters to find their strongest bracing position.
Drill: The “Immovable Wall” Test
Setup: Skaters pair up. Skater A is the blocker; Skater B is the hitter. They start facing each other, slightly offset (shoulder-to-hip block distance).
Goal: Skater A’s goal is zero forward movement—as if they are anchored to the floor.
- Instruction to Skater A (The Blocker): “Get into your lowest, strongest block stance. When B hits you, your goal is to absorb the impact and redirect it laterally, but you must not move your skates forward at all. Think ‘rooted to the floor.'”
- Instruction to Skater B (The Hitter): “Deliver a quick, strong forward push into Blocker A’s shoulder/hip. Aim to knock them forward.”
- Coaching Focus: The trainers watch Blocker A. If A slides forward, the trainer should immediately tell them, “You moved forward! Find a lower stance, engage your core, and use your outside edge more.”
Trainer Takeaway: This drill is the only way to teach a skater what maximum stability feels like. If they can hold this against a strong hit, they have the foundational body control for any block.
Phase 2 Drill: Adding the Control Step (World Skate Application)
This drill takes the stability learned in Phase 1 and adds the controlled, minimal forward motion needed for legality.
Drill: The “Minimum Movement” Block
Setup: Skaters remain paired.
Goal: Skater A’s goal is to maintain the stability from Phase 1, but deliberately add a minimal forward step after the initial impact.
- Instruction to Skater A (The Blocker): “Assume your strong, anchored position. When B hits you, you will hold your anchor for a split second (like Phase 1). THEN, you will execute one small, intentional forward step to become legal, and immediately re-anchor.”
- Instruction to Skater B (The Hitter): “Deliver the same quick, strong push.”
- Coaching Focus: The trainers must watch for two things:
- Success: Did A maintain lateral engagement while only taking one controlled step?
- Failure: Did A take too many steps or were they pushed forward as a reaction (losing their anchor)?
Trainer Takeaway: This drill demonstrates that the forward movement is an intentional action built upon a foundation of strength, not a defensive reaction to being hit. They are combining the WFTDA-style anchor with the World Skate requirement.
By focusing on this clear two-phase progression, your trainers will see that the ‘illegal’ WFTDA technique is simply the necessary isolation phase that unlocks advanced, legal World Skate blocking.
Here are a few options for Mantras your skaters and trainers can use:
Mantras for Blocking Progression
For Phase 1: Mastering the Anchor (WFTDA Training Mindset)
These phrases emphasize stability and zero-movement.
- “ROOT IT. HOLD IT.”
- (Simple, direct, and emphasizes grounding.)
- “IMPACT THEN IMMOVABLE.”
- (Focuses on absorbing the hit without giving ground.)
- “I AM CONCRETE.”
- (A strong visual cue for non-movement.)
For Phase 2: Adding the Control Step (World Skate Application)
These phrases link the initial stability to the minimal required movement.
- “ANCHOR, THEN STEP 1.”
- (Connects the foundation with the single, intentional forward step.)
- “STABLE, THEN LEGAL.”
- (Reinforces that stability comes first, then the movement that makes it legal.)
- “CONTROLLED, NOT COMPROMISED.”
- (Highlights that the skater must be in control of the movement, not forced by the opponent.)
Suggested Trainer Use:
Encourage the trainers to use the mantra for the specific phase they are drilling. For example:
- During the Immovable Wall Test (Phase 1), the trainers simply shout, “ROOT IT. HOLD IT!”
- During the Minimum Movement Block (Phase 2), the trainers call out, “ANCHOR, THEN STEP 1!”
This verbal cueing will help the skaters mentally transition between the “stop-block” foundation and the “legal movement” application.
